ThisIsNot
Top 1000 Contributor
ThisIsNot's Stats
- Review Count17
- Helpfulness Votes621
- First ReviewNovember 25, 2011
- Last ReviewJune 23, 2017
- Featured Reviews0
- Average Rating4.2
Reviews Comments
- Review Comment Count32
- Helpfulness Votes94
- First Review CommentMarch 11, 2012
- Last Review CommentJuly 10, 2017
- Featured Review Comments0
Questions
- Question Count0
- Helpfulness Votes0
- First QuestionNone
- Last QuestionNone
- Featured Questions0
- Answer Count17
- Helpfulness Votes16
- First AnswerJune 11, 2010
- Last AnswerApril 27, 2017
- Featured Answers0
- Best Answers2
Bose - FreeStyle™ Earbuds - Ice Blue
Your music says a lot about you. So do your headphones. Bose® FreeStyle™ earbuds have fresh designs to fit your style and deep, clear sound to make you love the music you love even more. The StayHear® ear tips provide a secure, comfortable fit.
A great pair of earbuds
Customer Rating
5.0
Posted by: ThisIsNot
from Cincinnati, OH
on December 2, 2014
Like all my other reviews, this will be a little long. I've been using these earbuds for almost 6 months now and they have been great. Bose makes the only earbuds that I can actually wear for long periods of time without feeling discomfort, they also make the only earbuds that will actually stay in my ears. Most other in-ear earbuds create a seal with your inner ear canal. That helps isolate noise better but I find them to be uncomfortable and those types of earbuds eventually pop out of my ears.
The Bose FreeStyle earbuds don't do that. They are extremely comfortable to wear for long periods of time and the StayHear tips come in three sizes so you should easily be able to get a perfect fit. The earbuds do let in some outside noise but this is beneficial when using them for exercise and running purposes. You don't want to go running down the street and not realize that a car is coming up behind you.
Bose really nailed the sound quality with these too. I'm not sure if they are worth the $130 price tag based on the sound quality alone. Don't get me wrong, the sound quality is good for earbuds. It's pleasantly balanced but the bass is a little lacking when compared to on-ear and over-ear headphones. That's just the nature of most earbuds though.
The FreeStyle earbuds are also water resistant so you can use them when exercising, running, at the gym, etc. They are a better buy than the Sports version of the SoundTrue earbuds. You don't get the small case but these are $20 less, have a cable length that's just write, and are water/sweat resistant just like the sport models. I really don't see any reason to spend the extra $20 on the sports models.
I only have to complaints when it comes to these earbuds:
1. The included carrying case is a little flimsy and overly big. A small, circular zip case (like what's included with the sports SoundTrue earbuds) would have been better. I've bent my case just with normal use and have since switched to a circular zip case I purchased for $2 online.
2. Bose doesn't make a version of the FreeStyle earbuds that work with Samsung Galaxy devices. The in-line remote and microphone have some Android/Samsung Galaxy compatibility. The mic works fine as does the play/pause button. Pressing that will also answer any incoming calls and double-pressing it will skip to the next track. That's it though. Triple-pressing the button does nothing and the volume buttons don't work. It would be nice if Bose released a version of these that were at least Samsung Galaxy compatible like they do with the sports and regular versions of the SoundTrue earbuds.
1. The included carrying case is a little flimsy and overly big. A small, circular zip case (like what's included with the sports SoundTrue earbuds) would have been better. I've bent my case just with normal use and have since switched to a circular zip case I purchased for $2 online.
2. Bose doesn't make a version of the FreeStyle earbuds that work with Samsung Galaxy devices. The in-line remote and microphone have some Android/Samsung Galaxy compatibility. The mic works fine as does the play/pause button. Pressing that will also answer any incoming calls and double-pressing it will skip to the next track. That's it though. Triple-pressing the button does nothing and the volume buttons don't work. It would be nice if Bose released a version of these that were at least Samsung Galaxy compatible like they do with the sports and regular versions of the SoundTrue earbuds.
All-in-all, these are great earbuds that I highly recommend. They have a modern style, are extremely comfortable, water/sweat resistant, and have nice sound quality for earbuds. I definitely recommend these over earbuds from other companies.
I would recommend this to a friend!
My Best Buy number: 0423936481
+2points
2out of 2found this review helpful.
Share this review:
Sol Republic - Tracks On-Ear Headphones - Black
Improve your music experience with these SOL REPUBLIC headphones that feature a V-8 sound engine for high audio quality. The polymer compound construction ensures durability and comfort for long-lasting use.
Great durability, bass-heavy sound
Customer Rating
4.0
Posted by: ThisIsNot
from Cincinnati, OH
on September 11, 2013
Sound Quality
3.0
Comfort
5.0
Durability
5.0
What's great about it: Durability, stylish, less expensive than overpriced Beats
What's not so great: Tends to favor lows and mids
I picked up these headphones to use on a daily basis so that I wouldn't have to worry about anything happening to my Bose or Sennheiser headphones (both of which are $250+). I wanted something that had decent sound quality, it was durable (which means no Beats, those are complete trash), and I wanted them to look a little stylish.
These are definitely fashion headphones. What I mean by that is that they favor design and looks first over sound quality. The entire Beats By Dre line are like this, the SMS audio line, Skullcandy, and many others are all like this. They come out with snazzy looking headphones that favor color choices and design over audio quality.
In my opinion, Sol Republic is the least "evil" of these companies. The Tracks are on par with headphones that cost $150-$200 from those other companies yet are just as stylish and offer more after-market customization options (such as replacing the headband, cable wire, or even buying new drivers all together). The sound quality of these are comparable (I think a little better) to the Beats Solo HD models yet cost $80 less. The headband can also be bent in every which direction without breaking and it will go back to its original form. Bending a Beats Solo HD headband will cause it to break. These are even more durable than those all metal Beats headphones which were advertised as being indestructible. The durability of the Tracks are even beyond that of the Beats Mixr which as "...most durable headphone ever."
I highly recommend the Tracks if you are looking for bass-heavy sound yet don't want to overpay for the likes of Beats by Dre or the SMS audio line from 50 Cent. The sound quality isn't going to live up to other brands in this price range (Sony, Sure, Sennheiser, Grado, etc.) but that is to be expected from a pair of fashion headphones. I find these to be very comfortable and use them everyday whether I am in my office, lab, or walking to classes. They fit fine, are able to isolate outside noise rather nicely, and don't have much sound leakage. These are my go-to everyday headphones due to their durability and lower prices.
Techno, dubstep, rap/hip-hop, and pop really shines with these as the lows and mids are heavily favor. People looking for a more balanced option should turn to the Track HDs as the lows and mids are dialed back a little while the highs are turned up just a bit. The Tracks Ultra are best suited for acoustic music as their bass is really lacking (pretty much the opposite direction of the Tracks) while the highs are heavily favored.
I mainly listen to metal with my Tracks and I'm pretty content though people in the metal community tend to be divided as to whether they prefer more bass or more highs (I started choosing my own music in the mid-90's and I watched a lot of MTV so I favor bass). The price may seem high when compared to Sony, Sennheiser, etc. and it is. However, the price is on the low side for a pair of fashion headphones especially when Beats and SMS are charging $180 and $200 (respectively) for headphones that sound no better than these and are less durable.
This product has... Perfect fit, Stylish
About me... Frequent traveler, Student
I would recommend this to a friend!
How Often Used:Daily
My Best Buy number: 423936481
+12points
12out of 12found this review helpful.
Share this review:
Bose® - SoundLink® Mini Portable Bluetooth Speaker - Black
Bose® SoundLink® Mini Speaker: Enjoy full, robust sound anywhere you go with this speaker that features an ultracompact design for easy movement from room to room. Bluetooth technology allows you to wirelessly stream music and more from your compatible cell phone, audio player and more.
Well worth the price, a little short on features
Customer Rating
4.0
Posted by: ThisIsNot
from Cincinnati, OH
on August 7, 2013
Sound Quality
5.0
Ease of Use
5.0
Features
3.0
What's great about it: Sound quality, construction, small size
What's not so great: Lacking some features, battery life, price
I have quite a collection of portable bluetooth speakers that include the Beats Pill, UE Boom, JamBox Big, a cheap no-name option, and now this. I am continually choosing to use the SoundLink Mini over my other options. It offers excellent high and low end response, much better than anything else I have tested. The UE Boom handles mids better but not by much, I think the SoundLink Mini has better balanced sound whereas the UE Boom sounds shallow due to its lack of bass. The only bluetooth speaker I have, which is able to outdo the SoundLink Mini in terms of sheer volume, is the JamBox Big. That is a $300 speaker though and it's to be expected. The UE Boom does get noticeably louder than the SoundLink Mini but it tends to distort the audio, especially bass-heavy music. I played a Rammstein song and the UE Boom sounded as if it was going to blow up while the SoundLink Mini handled everything with ease. Bose engineers were able to get more out of the SoundLink Mini compared to Ultimate Ear (now a Logitech company) as the Mini and Boom use a very similar setup.
The construction of the SoundLink Mini is very solid and looks like it came right off of an Apple assembly line. The speaker will easily blend in with an office desk, dorm room, bedroom, or kitchen and still look sophisticated. The only negative aspect regarding the use of brushed aluminum is that it can scratch, that is why I recommend buying one of Bose's soft covers along with this.
I do have a few complaints regarding this. First, the price is a little hefty for the amount of features that this has. I have become used to adjusting the volume of a bluetooth speaker using the volume adjustment on my iPhone. The UE Boom and JamBox Big are both like this. The volume on my iPhone controls the volume that the speakers play at. It's a nice feature so I don't always have to keep hitting buttons on top of the speaker just to turn things slightly up or down. Plus it allows me to be in the kitchen and change the volume while the speaker is on my porch. The SoundLink Mini does not have this feature though. At $200, I think it should be standard. The battery life is also short. Both the UE Boom and JamBox Big are able to squeeze 15 hours out of a single charge. Although the SoundLink Mini is the same size as the UE Boom, it lasts for half of that. I would have been OK with a 10 hour run time (at least enough to match my iPad mini) but I normally get about 6.5-7 hours out of a single charge. Lastly, this does not have speakerphone capabilities. I have never used any of my bluetooth speakers as speakerphones so I could care less but that is important to some people.
Some people complain about the lack of micro-USB charging with the Mini. I think that the charging cradle Bose includes with every speaker is much better than relying on either a hefty proprietary charging setup (like the AC adapter that comes with the JamBox Big and Beats Pill) or having yet another generic USB charger in my collection. The charging cradle is dead-simple to use and, at the end of the day, I normally just plop my speaker into that (with the soft cover on). It's really convenient and I think outweighs the lack of USB charging. Bose also includes a small AC adapter that can fold to take up less space. It's about 1/4 the size of my iPhone 5.
The SoundLink Mini has a micro-USB port for firmware updates and I really hope Bose adds more features (mainly volume adjustment on a device and a battery indicator icon in the iOS/Android task bar) down the line. Right now the features are a little short, especially when compared to the UE Boom, JamBox, or JamBox big. It is easily the best sounding $200 bluetooth speaker but I have to knock the score for those couple of aspects. I would have preferred if Bose made the unit a little heavier and bigger so that a larger battery could be included. If you favor sound quality, I can fully recommend the SoundLink Mini. It is portable enough to take anywhere and has the best sound from a speaker in the $200-$250 price category. However, if you are looking for something that has more features and can take more of a beating, I recommend going with the UE Boom. It is water resistant and has every feature that is missing from the SoundLink Mini. Bose may eventually get there but Logitech (and even Jawbone) are already implementing those features into their speakers now.
I still chose to use the SoundLink Mini on a daily basis as I value sound quality over everything else. It is small enough that I can throw it in my backpack without noticing or even a cargo pocket on my shorts without issues. Bose can improve things over time and I hope they do.
This product has... Perfect fit
About me... Frequent traveler, Student
I would recommend this to a friend!
Type of Listener:Avid listener
Most Important to Purchase:Sound quality
How Often Used:Daily
My Best Buy number: 423936481
+39points
46out of 53found this review helpful.
Share this review:
Apple - Smart Cover for Apple® iPad® 2nd-, 3rd- and 4th-Generation - Dark Gray
This Apple Smart Cover MD306LL/A features a polyurethane exterior with a microfiber lining to keep your iPad free of dust and protected against bumps and scratches. The aluminum hinge magnetically aligns the cover with the iPad for an ideal fit.
The best Smart Cover from Apple
Customer Rating
4.0
What's great about it: Minimal, hides dirt, easy to install, fully works with iPad 3
What's not so great: Expensive, does not cover back
This is easily the best Apple Smart Cover on the market. It provides the same functionality as the leather models but it can take more abuse and it doesn't show dirt like the lighter colors do. I owned the black leather Apple Smart Cover for 7 months and I had to replace it with another case. The cover had worn edges that were almost exposing the metal underneath, new scratches had formed, and I had to wipe it down about once a week. The only upside to the leather ones is that they look more professional. Other than that, they are not worth it.
Sme people might be turned away from the bland dark gray color but it looks more professional than the lighter and pastel colors and it hides dirt better too. This Smart Cover, like the others, works with the iPad 3 (aka the new iPad) so that it will wake the unit up and put it to sleep. The magnet that holds it to the iPad 2/3 is strong enough to pick the iPad up so you don't have to worry about it coming off at random times. You can fold the cover over and use the iPad in various positions.
My only gripe against this is that the cover does absolutely nothing for the back of the iPad. It leaves it fully exposed and the brushed aluminum will scratch over time with standard use. I highly recommend buying a back snap cover for the iPad if you want to use this. Best Buy sells ones from Belkin for $30 that fits the iPad 3 and it doesn't add much bulk. Doing so drastically increases the cost of using Apple's Smart Cover though. I spent over $70 with tax on this and the Belkin solution. However, it is currently the only way to guarantee you are buying a case/cover that will wake an iPad 3 and out it to sleep. Until 3rd party manufacturers adapt their cases to the iPad 3, there is no other option except waiting.
I would recommend this to a friend!
+7points
7out of 7found this review helpful.
Share this review:
Apple TV® - Black
Apple TV®
A review from someone who actually owns it
Customer Rating
4.0
Ease of Use
5.0
Performance
5.0
What's great about it: Easy to setup, iTunes store integration, 1080p
What's not so great: Needs more media apps
I have had my Apple TV for a few days now, I also have the 2010 Apple TV and have been using that since it launched. The 2012 Apple TV finally brings 1080p video output and it works with 1080p videos from the iTunes Store or ones being streamed to it via AirPlay from and iPad 2, iPad 3, or iPhone 4S.
First off, 1080p videos from the iTunes Store are top notch. They aren't quite Blu-ray quality but they are better than broadcast HDTV and DVDs. The common consumer likely wouldn't notice the difference between Blu-ray and this. All-in-all, this was a much needed update that produces a noticeable bump in video quality for 1080p capable sets with people sitting at appropriate distances from them. Even Netflix outputs at 1080p for select titles.
The user interface (UI) was also been updated . Owners of the 2010 Apple TV can also uograde to the new OS and get the new UI too. It is also a much needed update as the general UI is icon driven. You don't have to scroll through text anymore in the home screen. Apps still generally rely on a text interface but it is more pleasing to look at an array of colorful icons than having to scroll through text.
AirPlay and AirPlay mirroring works great. I am a little disappointed that my iPad 3 cannot mirror to my AppleTV at 1080p but that is OK as 720p mirroring looks good. Text can be a little blurry but it performs smoothly.
The Apple TV is extremely easy to setup and will automatically detect an optimal output resolution. Additionally, it will pick up a wi-fi network rather easily. Entering a password for an encrypted network (and for your Apple ID) can e tedious with the remote but you only have to do it once. The Apple TV integrates with your iTunes Store account so that you can stream all of your previous music, TV show, and movie purchases for free.
There are some cons to this though and these are the only things stopping the Apple TV from getting a perfect score. First off, not every movie or TV Show in the iTunes Store is 1080p. You also can't stream certain previously purchased movies using iCloud. This has to do with a deal that some of the movie companies have with HBO. Apple and HBO are working on this but it may take some time. Secondly, there is pretty much only one media app: Netflix. It would be nice to have Hulu Plus and HBO Go on the Apple TV. That is essentially my biggest complaint as it would open up the Apple TV to become a much more well rounded device. Others are complaining that more iOS apps aren't available for the Apple TV but I could really care less about being able to play Angry Birds or use Pages on my Apple TV. I just think that Apple should open it up for more media apps.
This product has... Fast connection, Easy to set up, Reliable connection
About me... Heavy media streamer
I would recommend this to a friend!
I use it in...:Apartment
+41points
44out of 47found this review helpful.
Share this review:
Apple - Dock Connector-to-VGA Adapter for Apple® iPad® - White
Use this dock connector-to-VGA adapter to connect your Apple iPad to a TV, projector or VGA display and watch videos and slideshows on the big screen with family and friends.
The product does what it is supposed to do
Customer Rating
4.0
What's great about it: It works if you know what you are getting into
What's not so great: Some apps/functions don't support this adapter
I am not sure why so many people are posting up 1 star reviews. I guess they didn't read anything about video output and just expected every app out there to have video out capabilities. Now, with the iPad 1 (along with the 4G iPod touch and iPhone 4, both of which this accessory works with!), you need to have an app that supports video output. You won't be able to plug it in and expect everything to work. Keynote will work when in slideshow mode, you can watch movies with the Video app, etc. The instructions have to actually be in the app in order for video to be coming out of those older devices.
The iPad 2, iPad 3, and iPhone 4S all support display mirroring which means you can plug this in and immediately get some type of video output showing the contents of your iDevice (just like a full fledged notebook). This means that everything will be displayed through the VGA connector regardless of if the app supports video output or not. For example, I can play Angry Birds and have it mirrored to my HDTV or projector.
There are limitations to it though as certain apps will lock video output. Hulu Plus and HBO Go come to mind where they won't allow the iPad to output video using this adapter (Netflix works though). Copy protected music videos (the older ones), TV Shows, and Movies also can't be output using this accessory.
That is why the VGA adapter is more geared towards business use. Apple released their HDMI adapter last year and that works with Hulu Plus along with copy protected video content purchased from the iTunes Store. It still doesn't work with HBO Go. VGA is really a legacy video connection in this day and age when notebooks, graphics cards, and monitors are working with mini display port and HDMI. However, many businesses and institutions still heavily rely on VGA due to having older equipment (that and business oriented projectors still tend to focus on just VGA input). That and VGA has never, ever supported audio output whereas HDMI carries both video and audio.
Do yourself a favor and pick this VGA adapter up only if you plan on using your iPad/iPod/iPhone in a business/school related environment. Otherwise you will have limited functionality (some of that is due to the MPAA) with some apps/functions.
I would recommend this to a friend!
+52points
53out of 54found this review helpful.
Share this review:
Gear4 - Black Bird Speaker for Apple® iPod®, iPhone® and iPad® - Black
Blast the music on your iPod, iPhone or iPad with this speaker that features a subwoofer that delivers powerful bass and an Angry Birds design, so you can show your love for the game.
A nice compact solution for Angry Birds fans
Customer Rating
5.0
What's great about it: Compact, sound quality, Angry Birds
What's not so great: No clock
I was initially skeptical of this unit but I was on the market for a compact speaker system that would work with my 4G iPod touch, iPad 2, and Droid X. I looked at models from other brands that incorporated clocks but they all seemed to lack sound quality, build quality, and/or they provided quirky performance.
Being an AngryBirds fan, I was immediately drawn to this. The bird is actually quite compact taking up very little space. My iPad overshadows this by a large margin. It easily fit on my small night stand and has a smaller footprint than most other speaker docks in this price range. The sound quality also surprised me. I wasn't expecting this small setup to do much but it can easily fill my bedroom with music that isn't distorted. The bass isn't going to rattle your walls but I feel that the sound quality is better than others at this price (I have only experienced 7 models, one from Sony and 6 from iHome).
This will fully charge modern iPods, iPhones, and iPads though it does not state anything about working with legacy iPods. The manual and box also state that the 1G iPod touch won't work with this. The included remote has a rather long range and offers some basic controls. I was able to select certain songs, playlists, artists, albums, etc on my iPod all with the remote.
I can highly recommend this for people who want a compact solution with surprisingly nice sound quality that can easily fill a kitchen, bedroom, dining room, garage, or even a workout room. The only things I have against it is the lack of a large built-in clock and the lack of compatibility with alarm apps that would put my iPod to sleep after a certain amount of time.
I would recommend this to a friend!
+9points
9out of 9found this review helpful.
Share this review:
ThisIsNot's Questions
ThisIsNot has not submitted any questions.
Bose® - SoundLink® Mini Portable Bluetooth Speaker - Black
Bose® SoundLink® Mini Speaker: Enjoy full, robust sound anywhere you go with this speaker that features an ultracompact design for easy movement from room to room. Bluetooth technology allows you to wirelessly stream music and more from your compatible cell phone, audio player and more.
Availability
When will the Bose Soundlink Mini be available online and in stores at Best Buy?
It's already available online, you will have to check your local store's stock (which you can do on bestbuy.com) to see if they have it available. If it isn't already at a store near you, feel free to contact them as only an employee would be able to provide insight.
10 years, 10 months ago
by
Posted by:
ThisIsNot
from
Cincinnati, OH
Does best buy price match items like this?
Yes. They will price match this item with brick and mortar stores in your area so long as the product is in-stock. They will also price match some websites such as Amazon.com if, and only if, the item is being sold by Amazon (i.e. nothing from the Amazon Marketplace).
10 years, 10 months ago
by
Posted by:
ThisIsNot
from
Cincinnati, OH
Bose® - SoundLink® Mini Portable Bluetooth Speaker - Black
Bose® SoundLink® Mini Speaker: Enjoy full, robust sound anywhere you go with this speaker that features an ultracompact design for easy movement from room to room. Bluetooth technology allows you to wirelessly stream music and more from your compatible cell phone, audio player and more.
Can multiple speakers be linked to a single device?
Not normally, no. The device playing the audio would have to support this feature. You cannot have multiple SoundLink Mini's hooked up to the same audio source all playing audio at the same time. The UE Boom offers a stereo/dual mono mode but that is a special feature enabled through their iOS/Android app. The SoundLink Mini does not support this with another Mini or any other bluetooth speaker.
10 years, 10 months ago
by
Posted by:
ThisIsNot
from
Cincinnati, OH
Bose® - SoundLink® Mini Portable Bluetooth Speaker - Black
Bose® SoundLink® Mini Speaker: Enjoy full, robust sound anywhere you go with this speaker that features an ultracompact design for easy movement from room to room. Bluetooth technology allows you to wirelessly stream music and more from your compatible cell phone, audio player and more.
Is this compatible with a Samsung phone
Yes so long as the phone has bluetooth capabilities. It will work with any bluetooth capable smartphone whether it is made by Motorola, Samsung, HTC, or even Apple.
10 years, 10 months ago
by
Posted by:
ThisIsNot
from
Cincinnati, OH
What is the difference between a 720p HD video and 1080p?
We are looking for a "rugged" camera for our college/track athlete son. He wants video of his throwing so that he can improve his performance. Any suggestions? College is costly will the $200. range fit our needs?
There are quite a few rugged cameras/camcorders that fit within your $200 budget. GoPro's entry level model is $199 and has pretty positive reviews. I suggest going down to your local electronics store and looking at them in person.
Now, onto your 720p vs 1080p question. Images (including video) are represented by a series of tiny squares. Each square represents a single pixel. Normally speaking, the higher the pixel count, the clearer the image. A 720p video/picture will have a resolution of 1280X720 pixels and a 1080p video/picture will have a resolution of 1920X1080 pixels. That means that 1080p provides more pixels while recording video.
None of that matters though if your TV, or the device you will be watching these videos on, doesn't have at least a 1080p resolution as well. There is no point in getting a 1080p camcorder if these videos are going to be watched on a 720p HDTV.
Now, onto your 720p vs 1080p question. Images (including video) are represented by a series of tiny squares. Each square represents a single pixel. Normally speaking, the higher the pixel count, the clearer the image. A 720p video/picture will have a resolution of 1280X720 pixels and a 1080p video/picture will have a resolution of 1920X1080 pixels. That means that 1080p provides more pixels while recording video.
None of that matters though if your TV, or the device you will be watching these videos on, doesn't have at least a 1080p resolution as well. There is no point in getting a 1080p camcorder if these videos are going to be watched on a 720p HDTV.
11 years, 2 months ago
by
Posted by:
ThisIsNot
from
Cincinnati, OH
I want to purchase a touchscreen camera.
I'm undecided between the kodak easyshare slice and the sony cybershot TX1. I want one that is top of the line and does everything, including takes excellent quality pictures. What do you recommend?
Well, if you want an ultra compact point and shoot, I would go with the Sony TX7. The TX1 is a first generation model with the newer features and the TX7 vastly improves on everything from the TX1. The panoramic feature is a lot smoother, you get 1080/60i video recording (with stereo audio), and low light photos are great.
However, if you don't feel like spending $350 on the TX7, you can always get the Sony HX5V. It is also a point and shoot digital camera but it is not as compact as the TX7. It actually has a better lens and 10X zoom but it lacks a touch screen. the HX5V can still easily fit in your pocket though the TX7 can fit in a credit card wallet. Another benefit is that the HX5V offers much better battery life than the TX7. You will get about 110 pictures out of the TX7 before the battery drians but the HX5V will go for about 310 with the GPS funciton on and I was able to get 450 with the GPS turned off.
However, if you don't feel like spending $350 on the TX7, you can always get the Sony HX5V. It is also a point and shoot digital camera but it is not as compact as the TX7. It actually has a better lens and 10X zoom but it lacks a touch screen. the HX5V can still easily fit in your pocket though the TX7 can fit in a credit card wallet. Another benefit is that the HX5V offers much better battery life than the TX7. You will get about 110 pictures out of the TX7 before the battery drians but the HX5V will go for about 310 with the GPS funciton on and I was able to get 450 with the GPS turned off.
14 years ago
by
Posted by:
ThisIsNot
from
Cincinnati, OH
confused
I am looking at 3 digital cameras around the same price.A Nikon,a Canon and a Sony.Which camera is best?Are all 3 cameras as good as far as quality and functions and picture wise?I bought a camera,don't want to mention the brand since it is good as far as TV's and monitors but 50% of my pictures are blurred so I need to know what to buy.Can you please help??I have a Canon 40D but do not allways like to carry a big camera so I need something that is great for a smaller camera.I've beem looking at the Sony H55 and a Nikon S8000 but can't choose.I like the idea of the panorama on the sony but wonder if the Nikon is better or maybe a canon.Help please.
Personally, I would not get either of the two models you listed. The Sony H55 is alright but low light photos suffer from bad quality, video recording is limited to mono audio and a 720p resolution, and the panoramic function isn't as smooth as it is in their higher end models. I don't have experience with the Nikon so I can't comment on that.
Actually, I think you would be better saving your money and going with either the Canon SX210IS or Sony HX5V. I recently had the choice between the two (along with less expensive models) but ended up going with the Sony HX5V. Twilight and low light photos are the best I have observed from any point and shoot and, based on the various online reviews, are the best from any point and shoot on the market. The videos look great at a full resolution of 1920X1080 (at 60i) and the panoramic function is something that completely surprised me.
Don't be turned off by the 10.1 MP resolution. It is better to have a lower resolution digital camera than one that packs in the extra pixels without improving photo quality. Remember that a bad 14.1 MP sensor is the same as having a bad 10.1 MP sensor.
Actually, I think you would be better saving your money and going with either the Canon SX210IS or Sony HX5V. I recently had the choice between the two (along with less expensive models) but ended up going with the Sony HX5V. Twilight and low light photos are the best I have observed from any point and shoot and, based on the various online reviews, are the best from any point and shoot on the market. The videos look great at a full resolution of 1920X1080 (at 60i) and the panoramic function is something that completely surprised me.
Don't be turned off by the 10.1 MP resolution. It is better to have a lower resolution digital camera than one that packs in the extra pixels without improving photo quality. Remember that a bad 14.1 MP sensor is the same as having a bad 10.1 MP sensor.
14 years ago
by
Posted by:
ThisIsNot
from
Cincinnati, OH